inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

2S

Techie. Writer. Photographer.

Mainstream or art?

First, the facts out of the way, shall we? I love Aamir Khan, I’m a big fan, and I think he’s the nation’s best actor, coming second only to B. The other Khans (Sallu, SRK), and the Khanlets (Fardeen, Zayed), and even the nanokhans (Arbaaz, Sohail, Jiya?) can take a walk in the park. This is the real performer. Don’t mess, enough said.

Aamir’s blog is him unplugged. And the bloke makes sense, loads of it. However, I tend to disagree with a couple, and exactly a couple of points here.

The market strength that I get from a film like FANAA allows me to do this (make films where he conveys a message from his heart). Plus I enjoyed doing FANAA. I am walking this balance and I am enjoying this journey.

Balance? I call it dilution, when you - as a star performer - ought to invest your time and effort entirely, and entirely, into producing quality cinema. If indeed, your dream is to make movies like Mangal Pandey, then go ahead and have the guts to do it. So what, if it wasn’t a success? You aren’t living on crumbs are you? I sense in him the fact that he’s taken it for granted - mainstream cinema ropes in the moolah.

With that attitude - coming from the best performer around - the gap between mainstream and art will never be bridged. Black tried. Parzania tried. Omkara tried. Why, even Morning Raaga tried.

His other comment on mainstream media made me think as well.

In my opinion the PRIMARY responsibility of cinema is to entertain.

Absofreakinlutely, but hello - there is serious potential in those very three hours of entertainment that you can use, that you can exploit, to rid the nation of it’s problems. Yes, people forget all their worries and come to watch a flick. They laugh and cry. But what happens after that? Where’s the impact? Where’s the footprint? Hit-and-run flicks will get us nowhere except for boosting popcorn sales, Aamir. Bollywood can change the way the country thinks, and they know it.

So, does this mean I like him less now? On the contrary, my respect for this great individual just shot up. Why? Okay, I’ll let you answer this: how many celebrities do you know actually sit and blog, and talk to their fans directly on a forum such as this?

Even the nanokhans wouldn’t.

3 Comments »

  Raj wrote @ August 13th, 2007 at 9:38 pm

With all due respect, Sandy, I also think that the primary purpose of mainstream cinema is to entertain but I completely agree with you on everything else. Coming back to the do-good part, if the guys in the industry ever wanted to rid the nation of it’s problems they would have joined politics instead. By just not making crappy movies, ppl like Aamir are doing a lot of good for the nation I feel…!

  Aamir Khan (*) wrote @ April 28th, 2008 at 3:03 am

Yaar saal mein ek aadh baar Fanaa nahi karoonga to mere baal bacche kya khayenge? Aur pata bhi hai Kiran kitni demanding hai, not like Reena, she ws the docile types.

Aur bhaiyaa sabse badi baat to yeh hai ke, I wanted to prove that yeh jo saalaa SRK-Chopra monopoly and mutual admiration society hai na, chutki, AK can break it any day in one chutki, bole to at the snap of a finger.

Mainstream, rearstream, upstream, downstream…Art or Arse AK can do anything and whatever he does he does it best

  Rajiv wrote @ April 28th, 2008 at 3:24 am

“Mainstream, rearstream, upstream, downstream…”

ROTFL. Ror ooo teee efff elll.

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>