inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

2S

Techie. Writer. Photographer.

Why Islamic Banking will fail in India

Islam prohibits usury.

It instructs all its followers to stay away from taking or giving any form of interest. Now interest, of course, is one of the basic foundations of banking. Which is why I flinch with disgust every single time I come across the paradoxical term - ‘Islamic Banking’. The whole idea behind prohibiting interest is to ensure that the borrower does not get taxed or punished. But with concepts like Murabaha, a customer faces an extra payment anyway. So what’s the deal?

For those who are new to Murabaha, it’s a typical Islamic banking product, as far as Shariah-compliance goes. Murabaha involves the bank purchasing a commodity at the market-value and then selling it to the customer at a higher price than the market-value. Instead of interest in a traditional loan, the bank makes a profit with the difference of the purchase value. Vehicle murabaha’s are a common sight in Islamic banks around the world. A simple example - you can’t afford a brand new Swift for 4.5 lakhs, so the bank purchases it at 4 and sells it to you at 5. The vehicle is under their ownership until you complete the installments.

But guess what? You end up paying 50k more. And that’s what it really is - a tweaked loophole, something that some folks are trying to exploit.

Islamic Banking has had its share of success in Arab nations, with many banks opening an Islamic branch and some even starting their own Islamic bank. The Middle East Bank in Dubai recently underwent a ‘conversion’ to Emirates Islamic Bank under the Emirates Banking Group. It’s being both - adopted and accepted.

But I don’t see something like that happening in this nation. For one, I haven’t seen the Muslim community unite and speak against usury in contemporary India. I’ve known many Muslims who invest in mutual funds, shares and traditional non-Shariah compliant banking products. Most Muslims in India who would go on to bank tend to think with a secular starting point. The government has done a decent job of separating the religion from an average Indian’s daily life, and most Muslims are already accustomed to getting through their day with their own adjustments as far as the faith is concerned. So, the first challenge would be to get the Muslim population of India to cross over to Shariah-compliant banking products, and they would have to cite the teachings from Islam’s core to bring about the change.

But hey, the bigger challenge would be to keep them on. Tax, if anything, is a killer in the nation and I don’t see how a Shariah-compliant banking product can offer tax-benefits to people who invest in it. This would, in all probability, take a serious hit on the Islamic banks in terms of popularity when everyone figure out that they don’t get much tax benefits anyway. Only the devout, who follow the Book to the T, would end up being loyal customers to an Islamic bank. And that’s a small number - hardly enough to sustain the operations of a financial institution.

There are one-off incidents, but on the whole, Muslims in India have managed to co-exist very well with their Hindu and Christian counterparts. Barring the Shiv Sena and the Godhra incidents, newer governments have done their bit to enforce that the Muslim community do not feel like a minority, even as the media might paint a different image. As we move towards religious harmony, setting up Islamic banks and enforcing it on the people not only threatens to divide the customers of India’s banking industry today, but it also gives right-wing Hindu extremists and the likes of the Sena a whisker of an opportunity to speak up against this, sparking more communal violence.

Islamic Banking might just make those extremist idiots look like smart-alecks. We don’t want that, do we?

It would be best if existing retail banks offer Islamic products within their current schemes and carry out their ledger-separation, overlooked by a Shariah authority, who can certify that the profit is indeed separated. Besides, it offers a more legitimate front - the Sena would have to think twice before attacking at a larger and more ‘legitimate’ organization like ICICI, Stancy, HDFC or HSBC.

We’d rather focus on the scams and bribery and give the common man his due. And work on the tax - it burns a landmine in the pocket.

3 Comments »

[…] [Crossposted] (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5) […]

  Abdul Shaikh wrote @ September 18th, 2007 at 2:48 pm

The point behind prohibiting Usury or Interest is that it kills the initiative to work. When you have money and you aslo know there are people who do not have money but have the desire to spend; you would lend your money to them. this is by far the most easiest way to make money for the lender and the same for the borrower to fulfil his disproporionate desire. On the other hand, if the lender and the borrower are restrained from taking/paying interest, both the parties would use there brains and find out ways to grow money so that they can fulfil their respective aspirations.

Another draw back of easy credit based on interet is that it creates a false improvement in the standard of living of an individual; not having adeaquate resources to back such a standard. This would inturn lead to conspicous consumption amoung people in the same strata of economic means. and all these people would be feeding of on easy interest based credit… putting their brains to rest and loosing the drive to accumulate means ahead of its useses.

  Nabeel wrote @ August 21st, 2008 at 8:21 pm

Hi , I am not going to comment on the Detail lines of what you have written. But here is a Question to you and the readers . If you cant Afford a swift for 4.5 Lakhs ( your example in the article ) then i would buy it sell it to at 5 with intallements based on mutual consent of the buyer and seller. So the profit is 50k for me that is 11.11% on the principle amount right ? Now traditional banking ; you have to give a down payment of lets say 1 lk and rest the interest would charged @ 11% minimum ( BLR ) so therefore if you calulate precisly you end up paying approx another 1 lk …… Now what is better ?

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>